|
LOS ANGELES --- We used to think the United States was all but immune
to dastardly sins plaguing other cultures. Certainly, and perhaps
most notably, our proven ability to pass the torch of power from
one government to another, without spilling a drop of blood, was
worthy of emulation.
Indeed, such
is happening in Asia more and more. A recent significant example
is Malaysia. Just recently, Mahathir Mohamad, prime minister since
1981, announced that hed be stepping down before too long.
Similarly, Singapore, though also dominated by one party, led the
way more than a decade ago, when its founding prime minister, Lee
Kuan Yew, moved aside for the younger Goh Tok Chong. Currently in
South Korea, political parties are gearing up for a vigorous December
election campaign to replace current President Kim Dae Jung, prohibited
by the constitution from repeating his five-year term -- and this
used to be a hard-nosed military dictatorship.
Of course, in
some countries, the torch is passed all too frequently. Japan, for
example, had so many different prime ministers in the 90s
that Clinton administration officials used to joke that wed
just figure out how to pronounced his name, and then hed be
gone.
Even so, America
can take pride in this proper emulation of civilized polity. Almost
certainly, South Korea will not revert to its brutal military ways.
The Japanese have anti-militarism embedded in their constitution.
Even China is changing its government at the top while going about
its business of improving the economy, trying to develop better
relations with Taiwan and placate the United States.
Will someone
give these countries some credit?
Yet a kind word
for Asia is not the same as a knock on the United States. Both cultures
can benefit from understanding -- and should certainly stop trashing
-- each other. Reflect, for a moment, on the bitter and frightening
Asian financial crisis (1997-99). Remember Washingtons frequent
public mantra at the time: the need for corporate openness and accounting
integrity. Almost daily, some Treasury official was delivering a
public lecture on how Asian business practices were deficient and
untrustworthy.
So are Asians
laughing or crying now over President George W. Bushs urgent
speech on the need for greater U.S. corporate responsibility? Heres
a pious-preaching nation that now has to admit its dirty hands.
Isnt it
obvious that America, the greatest nation in the world, should learn
some humility?
Heres
what I mean. When the Enron and Arthur Andersen scandals surfaced
-- and now allegations are surfacing about Bristol-Myers Squibb
and Qwest, the U.S telecommunications company, not to mention WorldCom
and Xerox -- they triggered the memory of a private dinner in 1998
arranged in Washington by a well-known Southeast Asian ambassador
for her visiting prime minister. Those invited were representatives
of U.S. media institutions -- from the Wall Street Journal and Newsweek
to the New York Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times
and so on.
After a bit
of time, a prominent U.S. editor rather rudely broached the issue
of why crony capitalism seemed to be reaching epidemic
proportions in Asia.
The Asian prime
minister, a brilliant, soft-spoken man, hardly knew what to say,
so insulting was the question.
Suddenly another
journalist broke the awkward silence:
Right,
crony capitalism, he said, sarcastically. We have nothing
whatsoever like that in the States. Those around the media
table grunted unanimously. Then that same dissenting journalist
added: Or do we have something similar in the United States?
An embarrassed
gasp, a soulful minute of reflection.
Just maybe we
have a different name for it. We call it campaign contributors.
Lets face
it: Avarice and corporate deception are the monopoly of no one culture.
In the United States, the issues of transparency, accountability
and deceptive accounting now appear to reach to the very top levels
of government. They also raise disturbing questions about the ethical
climate of the U.S. business culture.
Thus, the true
greatness of America is yet to come: How well will it cope with
these difficult questions via reform, legislation and self-reflection?
If it is successful, it will set an example for the world at least
as significant as its forthright effort in the war on terrorism.
And that would
be truly worth crowing -- maybe even preaching -- about.
|