LOS ANGELES -- Colin Powell, who is widely liked almost everywhere,
especially in Asia, said a lot of things while there that many people
in the region disagreed with. By contrast, Mahathir Mohamad, who is
not so widely liked everywhere, especially in the West, said a lot
of things that many in his region agreed with.
Together, this
week these two political figures -- the U.S. secretary of state
and the long-reigning Malaysian prime minister -- framed the worldwide
debate on emerging U.S. policy in Iraq and North Korea.
Powell, who
was visiting Tokyo, Beijing and Seoul, faced the tougher Asian audience
by far. The Japanese are unhappy over the recent escalation of tension
between Pyongyang and Washington, and unwilling to shoulder any
of the financial costs of a U.S.-led war on Iraq, as they did in
1991. While they didn't overtly balk at Powell's insistence on a
multilateral approach to re-engaging North Korea, they privately
grumbled that if the Bush administration hadn't thrown cold water
on Seoul's Sunshine Policy, there would be no multinational need
to cope with the North Korean crisis now.
The Japanese,
of course, are too polite to say that. Indeed, even after North
Korea moved to reactivate its Yongbyon nuclear reactor and launch
a short-range missile earlier this week, Japan wisely played it
cool. "We are not thinking about protesting to North Korea,"
declared Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi.
It was more
or less the same reaction to Powell among the Chinese. Washington
hopes that Beijing will lean on Pyongyang. But China believes that
if North Korea is leaned on too oafishly by anyone, the whole country
may keel over and millions of refugees will spill over into China
and South Korea.
As a consolation
prize to Powell -- for the Chinese recognize him as the most reasonable
high-level interlocutor they have in Washington -- they agreed to
continue back-channel pressures to keep Kim Jong Ill from going
off the deep end. And they gave no indication that a Chinese veto
would stand in the way of what the U.S. wants to do in Iraq, as
unenthused as the Chinese are about what President George W. Bush
wants to do.
In Seoul, Powell
conferred with Roh Moo Hyun, the new president of South Korea, once
America's most staunch Asian ally. Reflecting popular sentiment,
the former labor lawyer ran for office bashing the United States
in much the same way U.S. presidential candidates ritualistically
bash Beijing (and who, once in office, then get serious). Powell
returned home having papered over the serious rupture in the bilateral
relationship that was triggered by the Bush administration's determination
to quash any semblance of softness toward the North.
There was certainly
no softness in the heart of Mahathir in Kuala Lumpur, the site of
the 13th summit assemblage of the nonaligned nations. If Powell's
style is cool, Mahathir's is generally anything but. Pandering to
the exasperation of the delegates representing 114 developing nations,
the summit's host tore into the West -- and, to some extent, extremists
in his own world -- for frightening the living daylights out of
everyone.
"The world
now lives in fear," he said in his keynote speech. "We
are afraid of everything. We are afraid of flying, afraid of certain
countries, afraid of bearded Asian men, afraid of the shoes of airlines
passengers, of letters and parcels, of white powder."
Mahathir, who
is stepping down soon, after more than two decades in power, was
one of the first Asian leaders to back the Bush administration's
war in Afghanistan. But this week, he intensified his criticism
of the United States for both its high moral tone (as if, he suggested,
only Western whites had a monopoly of rectitude) and for choosing
war to resolve the Iraqi crisis. It's "a revival of the old
European trait of wanting to dominate the world (invariably involving)
injustice and oppression of people of other ethnic origins and colors,"
he said, warning that "It is no longer just a war against terrorism.
It is in fact a war to dominate the world -- i.e., the chromatically
different world."
Having painted
the world in such terms, he offered another disturbing thought:
"The result of this confrontation between the haves and the
have-nots, the developed and the developing, is a world that is
practically ungovernable."
Mahathir's style
-- he shouted at the top of his lungs, belittled globalization,
took gratuitous jabs at Israel -- was as bombastic as Powell's was
low-key. Alas, for most Westerners, that style too often overshadowed
his substance. If Mahathir understood that Westerners are not so
hard of hearing, he might find more of us less inclined to cover
our ears.
|